How I finally understood what a class is
Originally published in dev.to
There's a saying that goes:
"Each head is a whole different world."
Which I find to be true
. Some may argue that a certain teacher doesn't know how to do his/her job, but maybe it's that the way he/she teaches is not compatible with the way your brain is "wired". I guess this is one of those things that is not just right or wrong.
Many things are open to interpretation, which may lead to the loss of valuable information.
So, today I want to explain the way the idea of a class
clicked for me. Not just in a conceptual way, but also on why they are useful in our code:
One of the first things we learn when we start programming are variables and constants.
So, if we are given the task of printing on the console your name
, age
and height
, you'll probably do something like this:
Note: I decided not to include using a class
like Scanner
to request input from the user to keep it as simple as possible.
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String name = "Chris";
int age = 23;
double height = 1.85;
System.out.println("name: " + name + ", age: " + age + ", height: " + height);
}
}
Which would output:
name: Chris, age: 23, height: 1.85
Great!
But, now we want to make our variable names a little more descriptive, how about adding a "chris" prefix? Check it out:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String chrisName = "Chris";
int chrisAge = 23;
double chrisHeight = 1.85;
System.out.println("chrisName: " + chrisName + ", chrisAge: " + age + ", chrisHeight: " + chrisHeight);
}
}
Nice!
Now, let's add another person's info:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String chrisName = "Chris";
int chrisAge = 23;
double chrisHeight = 1.85;
System.out.println("chrisName: " + chrisName + ", chrisAge: " + age + ", chrisHeight: " + chrisHeight);
String danielName = "Daniel";
int danielAge = 27;
double danielHeight = 1.71;
System.out.println("danielName: " + danielName + ", danielAge:" + danielAge + ", danielHeight:" + danielHeight)
}
}
Hmmm... 🤔
Are you starting to see a pattern?
We are storing the same 3 values from 2 different people...
This is when a class
comes to the rescue!
Let's refactor our code step by step by focusing on one person
at a time.
The Chris class
In OOP (Object Oriented Programming), classes
are made to represent both state and behaviour with a high level of cohesion. In english: that means that the variables and methods of a given class
are related to each other. If a method does not use any of the variables inside a class
, it's probably a sign that it is where it doesn't belong.
Now that we have this idea, we can make a Chris class
with a default constructor that will take the values of chrisName
, chrisAge
and chrisHeight
:
A
constructor
is a special kind of function that must have the same name as theclass
it belongs to + have no return value (doesn't even need thevoid
keyword), which is normally used to make sure that an instance of thatclass
is in avalid state
.
Valid state
means that anobject
has the values that are expected.An
object
is a concrete implementation of aclass
(we will see it in action later).
So, our Chris class
would look like this:
// Java
public class Chris {
private String name;
private int age;
private double height;
public Chris(String name, int age, double height) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.height = height;
}
}
The keyword
this
is used to refer to the global scope of ourclass
in order to differentiate thename
parameter of theconstructor
from the actual global scope'sname
.
Now we can refactor our code in order to use our new and shiny Chris class
!
So, instead of:
String chrisName = "Chris";
int chrisAge = 23;
double chrisHeight = 1.85;
We can have:
Chris chris = new Chris("Chris", 23, 1.85);
The keyword
new
is used to refer to theconstructor
of our Chrisclass
.And
chris
(notice the lower case "c") is what we call anobject
, because it is a concrete or "real" implementation of our Chrisclass
.
But since we don't have our chrisName
, chrisAge
and chrisHeight
anymore, our code won't compile correctly.
Interesting...
How can we fix this?
Well, if we go back to our Chris class
implementation, we can see that our global scope's variables (also known as fields
, private fields
or member variables
) are private
. So, we can't access them from the outside.
In order to be able to do that, we must add public
methods that can help us access that data.
// Java
public class Chris {
private String name;
private int age;
private double height;
public Chris(String name, int age, double height) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.height = height;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public int getAge() {
return age;
}
public double getHeight() {
return height;
}
}
Did you notice how those get...() methods don't use the
this
keyword? That's because there are no parameters that can match their names, so the compiler knows that we are referring to the global scope's variables instead.
Now that we have these methods, we can access them by using the dot (.) operator, like this:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Chris chris = new Chris("Chris", 23, 1.85);
System.out.println("chrisName: " + chris.getName() + ", chrisAge: " + chris.getAge() + ", chrisHeight: " + chris.getHeight());
String danielName = "Daniel";
int danielAge = 27;
double danielHeight = 1.71;
System.out.println("danielName: " + danielName + ", danielAge:" + danielAge + ", danielHeight:" + danielHeight)
}
}
That's better!
No, wait...
Now we gotta do the same for Daniel, let's create a Daniel class
:
The Daniel class
// Java
public class Daniel {
private String name;
private int age;
private double height;
public Daniel(String name, int age, double height) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.height = height;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public int getAge() {
return age;
}
public double getHeight() {
return height;
}
}
And now our Main class
would be:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Chris chris = new Chris("Chris", 23, 1.85);
System.out.println("chrisName: " + chris.getName() + ", chrisAge: " + chris.getAge() + ", chrisHeight: " + chris.getHeight());
Daniel daniel = new Daniel("Daniel", 27, 1.71);
System.out.println("danielName: " + daniel.getName() + ", danielAge:" + daniel.getAge() + ", danielHeight:" + daniel.getHeight())
}
}
Nice!
Now our Main class
is shorter than before.
But there's still one more thing we need to do...
If you really think about it, we are basically doing the same logic inside our Chris and Daniel classes
🤔.
Which means we are not using the right abstraction for this particular case. In order to find a solution, we need to know what Chris and Daniel are...
That's right! They are both a Person
.
So if we delete the Daniel class
and rename our Chris class
to "Person", our code would end up being:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Person chris = new Person("Chris", 23, 1.85);
System.out.println("chrisName: " + chris.getName() + ", chrisAge: " + chris.getAge() + ", chrisHeight: " + chris.getHeight());
Person daniel = new Person("Daniel", 27, 1.71);
System.out.println("danielName: " + daniel.getName() + ", danielAge:" + daniel.getAge() + ", danielHeight:" + daniel.getHeight())
}
}
What benefits did we get?
- Our code is now shorter and without losing it's meaning.
- We reduced the need of 2 new
classes
to 1. - We reduced the noise of repeating both "Chris" and "Daniel" in more places than needed.
- We managed to reuse our logic in a single
class
. - Now we can quickly know that both
chris
anddaniel
are concrete implementations of the same class, or how I like to call them: brothers. - Now we can use this Person
class
even in other projects and it will still work just fine.
I hope this example can help you, Mr./Mrs. Reader, to clear out your thoughts on what class are and why we use them in Object Oriented Programming
See you in the next post!
Bonus tip
This one comes from @alphashuro's comment down below: another benefit is that now we can replace the parts in our code where we print a Person
's information by making a function that takes a Person
object, like this:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Person chris = new Person("Chris", 23, 1.85);
printPersonalInfo(chris);
Person daniel = new Person("Daniel", 27, 1.71);
printPersonalInfo(daniel);
}
public static void printPersonalInfo(Person person) {
System.out.println("name: " + person.getName() + ", age:" + person.getAge() + ", height:" + person.getHeight());
}
}
And by making this "small" change we get the benefit of not having to maintain two different lines of code. There's just only 1 place in our code that we have to change in case we need to present someone's information in a different way.
Thanks to Alpha for bringing this up.
Now, there's another adjustment that I would do to our code.
Since the printPersonalInfo()
function is only accepting Person
objects, this means this method is directly dependent of the Person
class. Which means, it should actually be part of it!
So let's go ahead and move our function to the Person
class instead of having it hanging around inside our Main
:
// Java
public class Person {
private String name;
private int age;
private double height;
public Person(String name, int age, double height) {
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
this.height = height;
}
// Imagine we still have the getters here :P
// this is just to make the code block shorter.
public void printInfo() {
System.out.println("name: " + name + ", age:" + age + ", height:" + height);
}
}
Now, you may have noticed that I had to make a few adjustments:
- Remove the
person
parameter. - Replace each Getter methods calls for the global variables.
- Renamed the method from "printPersonalInfo()" to "printInfo()".
The last point can be optional or personal preference. Personally, I find the "Personal" part of the name to be little redundant since we know we will create a Person
object later.
Ok, so now we also have to make some adjustments to our Main
class with this new implementation:
// Java
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Person chris = new Person("Chris", 23, 1.85);
chris.printInfo();
Person daniel = new Person("Daniel", 27, 1.71);
daniel.printInfo();
}
}
If you think about it for a second, we don't even need the Getter methods, this way of doing things is related to one of OOP's principles known as "encapsulation" which is a topic for another post 😉.
🎊 Bonus points for you if you read the whole thing! 🎉